Re: Re: Hakka Q Hipe


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Tires BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Stan on October 20, 1999 at 13:17:25:

In Reply to: Re: Hakka Q Hipe posted by Morrie Van Dorp on October 20, 1999 at 10:29:39:

anything can be made to sound good if it is taken out of context. Yeah Hakka Q came first. good for you. Were the test subjective? Do they involve any journalist seat of the pants "feel"? Which categories did Hakka Q came last (according to the article, HakkaQ wong 7 out of 9)?Could the failures be braking on ice, snow or lateral grip? How is the score calculated? The tire that came third, was it 1 point behind, 5 points or 10 points? How much did that tire cost compared to Hakka?

See how all of a sudden when someone says "Yeah Nokian came in first in a test" doesn't seem to mean that much anymore



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: Re: Re: Re: Hakka Q Hipe

Comments:

Optional:
Link URL:
Link Title:
Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Tires BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Back to Autopedia Home Page

email imageemail image

Last modified 01/14/99. Copyright ©1995-99 by AUTOPEDIA, all rights reserved. AUTOPEDIA, AUTO411, CAR-IQ, DEALERPEDIA, UNILOT, SIMULSEARCH and INTERQUOTE-RFP are trademarks of AUTOPEDIA. All other trademarks, tradenames and/or service marks are the property of their respective holders.